LAGOS, NIGERIA – APRIL 2026 – Just shy of three years since the audacious removal of the long-standing fuel subsidy and the unification of foreign exchange windows, Nigeria's economic landscape presents a stark paradox. What was heralded as a decisive fiscal reset, designed to unshackle the nation's finances and redirect vital funds, has instead led to a deepening debt crisis, with the projected gains from these reforms seemingly swallowed whole by an insatiable appetite for borrowing and escalating debt service costs. As of April 2026, the nation grapples with a burgeoning debt profile, casting a long shadow over promised prosperity and leaving many to question the efficacy of the reforms.
What’s Really Happening: A Nation Under the Weight of Debt
The bold economic reforms initiated by President Bola Tinubu's administration in mid-2023, specifically the removal of the fuel subsidy and the unification of exchange rates, were met with both applause and apprehension. The removal of the fuel subsidy, which had cost the country over $84 billion between 2005 and 2022, was seen as a necessary but painful step to curb waste and free up funds for critical sectors. Indeed, initial reports in mid-2025 indicated a significant boost in government revenue, with petroleum savings surging from ₦154 billion to ₦836 billion between January and March 2025 alone. State and local governments reportedly received ₦15.26 trillion in 2024, a substantial increase from ₦6.16 trillion in 2023, with many using these allocations to clear debts and invest in infrastructure.
However, this fiscal breathing room proved fleeting. By late 2025 and into early 2026, the narrative shifted dramatically. The gains from subsidy removal have been largely absorbed by the escalating cost of debt servicing. An October 2025 report by the Socio-Economic Rights Accountability Project (SERAP) highlighted that despite ₦14 trillion of subsidy savings shared across states and the FCT, there had been little discernible improvement in infrastructure or public services. The 2026 federal budget starkly illustrates this dilemma, projecting debt servicing at a staggering ₦15.52 trillion, or even higher at ₦15.809 trillion, with some analyses suggesting it could reach ₦20.5 trillion. This figure, in a grim turn, often exceeds the combined allocations for crucial sectors like health, education, and security.
Nigeria’s total public debt has ballooned, standing at approximately ₦152.4 trillion (around $99.66 billion) as of June 30, 2025, rising to ₦153.3 trillion by September 30, 2025. Some sources even put the public debt at about $110.3 billion as of December 31, 2025, or $115 billion in April 2026. A significant contributor to this surge was the securitisation of ₦22.7 trillion in inherited Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Ways and Means Advances, alongside fresh borrowings to finance budget deficits and infrastructure. The sharp depreciation of the naira following the unification of exchange rates has also significantly inflated the naira value of external debt, even when the dollar-denominated obligations remained relatively stable. The National Assembly recently approved an additional $6 billion in external financing to support the 2026 budget, further underscoring the government's reliance on borrowing.
‘Nigeria is no longer borrowing to build; Nigeria is borrowing just to stay afloat. And even that survival is borrowed.’ These words, echoing in the halls of economic discourse, capture the essence of a nation seemingly trapped in a cycle of debt.
Data Breakdown: The Numbers Tell a Troubling Tale
The economic forecasts for 2026 present a mixed bag. While GDP growth is projected to be cautiously optimistic, ranging from 4.0% to 4.68%, inflation remains a persistent challenge. Although the annual inflation rate saw a slight decrease to 15.06% in February 2026 from 15.10% in January 2026, projections indicate it will average around 16.5% for the year. The naira's exchange rate is expected to hover between ₦1,400 and ₦1,745 per US dollar in 2026, reflecting continued volatility despite efforts to stabilize the market.
The federal government's budget for 2026, approved at a massive ₦68.32 trillion (approximately $49.4 billion), earmarks ₦32.29 trillion for capital expenditure, ₦15.43 trillion for recurrent spending, and a colossal ₦15.81 trillion for debt servicing. The proposed budget implies a staggering deficit-to-revenue ratio of about 70 percent, meaning that for every ₦100 the government expects to earn, it plans to borrow ₦70. This highlights an alarming fiscal indiscipline where capital spending is increasingly funded by debt.
- Nigeria's Total Public Debt (Sept 2025): ₦153.3 Trillion
- 2026 Budget Debt Servicing Allocation: ₦15.81 Trillion (approx.)
- Debt Service to Revenue Ratio (Late 2025): Approximately 66%
- Projected 2026 Budget Deficit-to-Revenue Ratio: 70%
- Startup Funding Decline (2025): 17% Year-on-Year to $343 Million
- January 2026 Startup Funding Inflow: $45.9 Million (43.47% Y-o-Y drop)
Market or Policy Impact: Crowding Out Growth and Stifling Innovation
The persistent debt burden and high debt servicing costs are having a profound impact across the Nigerian economy, particularly on the burgeoning tech ecosystem. The government's heavy reliance on domestic borrowing, through instruments like Treasury bills and FGN bonds, creates a 'crowding-out effect.' High-yield government securities offer banks risk-free returns, incentivizing them to park funds in sovereign debt rather than lending to businesses. This translates to limited access to credit and punishing interest rates for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), starving productive sectors of vital investment and hindering job creation.
The Nigerian startup ecosystem, once Africa's darling, is feeling the pinch acutely. 2025 saw total funding fall by 17% year-on-year to $343 million. This decline pushed Nigeria's share of Africa's venture capital inflows down to 11%, its lowest since 2019, even as other major African markets rebounded. The trend worsened into early 2026, with January inflows dropping 43.47% year-on-year to $45.9 million compared to $81.2 million in January 2025. This places Nigeria firmly behind other 'Big Four' African markets like South Africa, Kenya, and Egypt in terms of attracting significant growth-stage capital.
Analysts point to a sharp pullback in equity investment, ongoing currency volatility, macroeconomic uncertainty, and higher global interest rates as key deterrents for investors. The absence of strong exit pathways and the withdrawal of global accelerators like Techstars and Y Combinator have further contributed to the challenging funding environment. While Nigeria still boasts the highest number of startup deals in Africa, indicating robust early-stage activity, it struggles to attract the larger equity cheques flowing to its counterparts. This has led to a significant pivot towards debt financing across the African startup landscape, with debt capital surging by 165% in early 2026 as startups seek less dilutive alternatives.
2024
2025
2026*
Debt Service as % of Government Revenue (*Projected)
What Needs to Change: Charting a Sustainable Path
The current trajectory is unsustainable. Nigeria's experience underscores a fundamental flaw in relying on debt-to-GDP ratios as the primary measure of sustainability; rather, the debt-to-revenue ratio offers a more accurate, and alarming, picture. The government's fiscal strategy, while aiming for reform-driven growth, is being undermined by a persistent inability to dramatically increase revenue and rein in expenditure.
Urgent fiscal restructuring is imperative, including asset sales and improved capital spending tied to real productivity. There's a critical need for transparent and efficient use of the remaining subsidy savings and increased federal allocations, with a focus on credible social protection programs to cushion the impact on vulnerable households. The country also needs a national conversation on debt management, moving beyond simply borrowing to fund deficits towards borrowing for value-creating projects.
For the tech ecosystem, fostering local investor participation to reduce reliance on volatile foreign capital is crucial. Policy consistency, reduced regulatory uncertainty, and a focus on creating visible exit pathways for investors are vital to restore confidence. The shift towards debt financing also highlights the need for a more diverse capital structure that supports startups with established revenue models. As Nigeria navigates these turbulent economic waters, bold, consistent, and well-coordinated fiscal and monetary policies are not just desirable, but absolutely essential to convert reforms into tangible progress and truly unleash the nation's immense potential.